Wednesday, November 12, 2008

Buddhist Economics - Part VI

This is a continuation of our discussion on Buddhist Economics based on
E. F. Schumacher’s book, ‘Small is Beautiful’. Part I discussed about Labor, Part II on Mechanization, Part III on Unemployment, Part IV on the Aims of Economic Systems and Part V on Simplicity and Non-Violence. Today, we will examine the concept of Sustainable Development.

On Sustainable Development
Modern economics does not distinguish between renewable and non-renewable materials, as its very method is to equalize and quantify everything by means of a money price. Thus, taking various alternative fuels, like coal, oil, wood, or water-power: the only difference between them recognized by modern economics is relative cost per equivalent unit.

The cheapest is automatically the one to be preferred, as to do otherwise would be irrational and "uneconomic." From a Buddhist point of view, of course, this will not do; the essential difference between non-renewable fuels like coal and oil on the one hand and renewable fuels like wood and water-power on the other cannot be simply overlooked.

Non-renewable goods must be used only if they are indispensable, and then only with the greatest care and the most meticulous concern for conservation. To use them heedlessly or extravagantly is an act of violence, and while complete non-violence may not be attainable on this earth, there is nonetheless an ineluctable duty on man to aim at the ideal of non-violence in all he does.

Just as a modern European economist would not consider it a great achievement if all European art treasures were sold to America at attractive prices, so the Buddhist economist would insist that a population basing its economic life on non-renewable fuels is living parasitically, on capital instead of income.

Caring for the Environment
Such a way of life could have no permanence and could therefore be justified only as a purely temporary expedient. As the world’s resources of non-renewable fuels—coal, oil, and natural gas—are exceedingly unevenly distributed over the globe and undoubtedly limited in quantity, it is clear that their exploitation at an ever-increasing rate is an act of violence against nature which must almost inevitably lead to violence between men.

This fact alone might give food for thought even to those people in Buddhist countries who care nothing for the religious and spiritual values of their heritage and ardently desire to embrace the materialism of modern economics at the fastest possible speed. Before they dismiss Buddhist economics as nothing better than a nostalgic dream, they might wish to consider whether the path of economic development outlined by modern economics is likely to lead them to places where they really want to be.

Towards the end of his courageous book The Challenge of Man’s Future, Professor Harrison Brown of the California Institute of Technology gives the following appraisal:

“Thus we see that, just as industrial society is fundamentally unstable and subject to reversion to agrarian existence, so within it the conditions which offer individual freedom are unstable in their ability to avoid the conditions which impose rigid organization and totalitarian control. Indeed, when we examine all the foreseeable difficulties which threaten the survival of industrial civilization, it is difficult to see how the achievement of stability and the maintenance of individual liberty can be made compatible.”

Even if this were dismissed as a long-term view there is the immediate question of whether "modernization," as currently practiced without regard to religious and spiritual values, is actually producing agreeable results. As far as the masses are concerned, the results appear to be disastrous—a collapse of the rural economy, a rising tide of unemployment in town and country, and the growth of a city proletariat without nourishment for either body or soul.

It is in the light of both immediate experience and long term prospects that the study of Buddhist economics could be recommended even to those who believe that economic growth is more important than any spiritual or religious values. For it is not a question of choosing between "modern growth" and "traditional stagnation." It is a question of finding the right path of development, the Middle Way between materialist heedlessness and traditionalist immobility, in short, of finding "Right Livelihood".


Damien Tan

"Modern economics does not distinguish between renewable and non-renewable materials, as its very method is to equalize and quantify everything by means of a money price."

There is some good news. This concern has given birth to a concept called Corporate Social Responsibility or CSR. Canon is a praticing example. Check out their Canon Goes Green campaign.

In the West, almost every major corporation I know uses CSR as a corporate strategy to tap into the groundswell of public concern about the evironment. There is a profit motive behind it because there's a public shift to buy goods that are branded "green." Western governments go a step further. They ban the sale of tropical hardwood goods because they don't like our forests to be cut, causing our loggers to complain, and they have a complex system of carbon footprinting to determine pollution controls for their factories. They set up a punishing tax code to make it unprofitable for polluters to operate there. Europe has one of the best schemes for carbon-fingerprinting consumer goods.

In the East, nobody believes in any of this of course but that's bad news. I'm sticking to good news today. ^_^


Let's hope it's not a case of too little, too late.


Nice blog, you care about our earth, our environtment. Your blog is very usefull. Keep spirit, we can save the earth with a litle thing. Regards. Seno.


Dear Seno,

Thanks for your kind words and encouragement. I'm sure every little bit that we do for the environment, helps.


Internet marketing

Having read all the post I totally recognize all the points are true.I liked all of them. Keep it up. Thanks a lot for sharing.... Looking forward to reading your next post..

Search Engine Marketing

I'm sure every little bit that we do for the environment. Thanks for your kind words and encouragement.

  © Blogger template 'Minimalist G' by 2008

Back to TOP